|Freedom of expression is not a license to be an asshole.|
Over the years, I have been critical of the “brogrammer” culture. I have also been critical of engineers who think gender is a disqualifying factor to work in technology. Last week, I further bemoaned the lack of women in the development profession. I placed much of the blame on a feedback loop of men pursuing computer science careers and providing a leg up to other men in the industry. It is also apparent to me that working in technology gives certain individuals the license to be an asshole to others.
One of my favorite business books is “The No Asshole Rule,” by Robert I. Sutton, Ph.D. Sutton does a fantastic job providing a scholarly definition of what an asshole is and reasons why you do not want them in your business. I think it should be required reading for any business person along with the “The Five Dysfunctions of a Team,” by Partick Lencioni.
According to Sutton, an Asshole has two traits:
- Test One: After talking to the alleged asshole, does the “target” feel oppressed, humiliated, de-energized, or belittled by the person? In particular, does the target feel worse about him- or herself?
- Test Two: Does the alleged asshole aim his or her venom at people who are less powerful rather those individuals who are more powerful.
Based on the above criteria, it is evident to me that the author of the Google memo is an asshole. The author considers himself and those like him intellectually and morally superior. Since they are superior, they should not have to debase themselves by having to educate, mentor, or collaborate with those people. This"other" could be women, ethnic minorities, and people living different lives.
A modern office is not an environment for this kind of thinking. Women make up a large percentage of the work force and are filling senior leadership positions. There are also countless people of color working as professionals. Finally, individuals who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender are collaborating with those who are not. Anyone who considers themselves superior to others not like them is going to create tension and undermine collaboration in the office. Eventually, behavior like this is going to trickle down to the bottom line. From an agile perspective, individuals who feel this sense of superiority are going to be resistant to continuous improvement. It is not a surprise the author of the diversity memo wrote this after attending a workshop on the bias.
As a manager and agilest I would have fired the author of the Google memo. He was a distraction to the firm and advocating for a direction that the company had openly rejected. Finally, his attitude to co-workers different than him would undermine any project he was assigned. Better to remove a polyp than deal with cancer which could kill your organization.
Until next time.
I am taking next week off to attend the Gen-Con game fair.