|Performance Appraisals are about as|
helpful as slapping your employees
At an early age we come in contact with the performance appraisal, it was called a report card. These pieces of paper and notes home to our parents were necessary to let them know how we were doing in school. If you were lucky you had parents like mine who were involved in your education and had a fairly good relationship with my teachers. If you were like other students I knew your parents would be surprised each time you brought back your quarterly report card. As you grew older report cards were a means to perform educational triage. Hard working and gifted students were moved to the front of the line for college preparation and scholarships while those who didn't measure up were cast aside like trash. Grades determined your official status in school and your possible desirability to go to college.
Flash forward four years of high school and another four years of college and when we get into the job world we expect to be free from the tyranny of report cards. Instead, report cards are replaced by performance appraisals. Unlike report cards, performance appraisals are not based on objective standards of excellence. They are based on the economic needs of the company. So you could have perfect attendance, not miss a deadline, and generate millions of dollars of sales and still receive a “meets expectations” on your appraisal. For a classic example of this kind of insanity, just take a look at Microsoft and its old stack ranking appraisal process. I feel very strongly that Microsoft hurt its ability to retain good employees and innovate because of this system; if everyone “meets expectations” and then the company really can’t meet the expectations of the customer. So good employees leave and mediocre and poor ones stay.
There is another reason I hate that hate performance appraisal and that is because it resembles management by fear. According to W. Edwards Deming, the godfather of lean manufacturing, one of the seven deadly diseases of management is the use of Evaluation pf performance, merit rating or annual reviews to control employees. People are not dumb, and if they know the metrics you are using to evaluate them they are going to game the system to get the best rating possible at the expense of the business and customer. For instance, if you reward a bus driver for on-time drop offs they will avoid picking up more riders during high traffic periods because that will affect their drop off times. This creates perverse situations where people are rewarded for poor customer service. People are afraid to do what is right for the customer instead they do what will be appraised in a positive fashion.
I am not against rating people and their performance, but the way we do it now reeks of mental illness. Managers should be in contact with their line employees daily providing coaching and encouragement. When a performance issue comes up it needs to be addressed right away instead of during the appraisal process. Immediate feedback when you screw up is much more helpful then trying to recall what you did during the middle of the fiscal year. Agile teams need to know how much velocity they can perform and if they are improving it. Sales people and marketing professionals need to know what is going on the top line of sales and how much margin you are making on the bottom line. All of this data is important and necessary, however you cannot squash it together into a gooey ball of muck an use it to objectively rate an employee. I would much prefer a manager telling me that the firm could only afford a two percent raise than telling me I met expectations and that is worth two percent. The honesty would be bracing.
So what do I propose as an alternative? I am a big fan of development plans. Every 90 days a manager should tell a person what they can do if they need to improve and what they need to do if they would like to advance to a higher position. In six month intervals, this information should be written down and then saved for HR purposes. This way over the life time of the employee there should be a record of the growth and development of the employee without the capricious rating system that most companies use. This forces managers to manage their employees instead of kissing up to their superiors.
At the end of the day, a business must satisfy the needs of their customers. I strongly believe that the performance appraisal process as it exists in contemporary companies satisfies neither the needs of the employees or those of customers. Something must change and I hope that as my business grows I will be one of the people leading this change.
Until next time.